Votes/sy-2007-08/User:Hamaryns for admin

User:Hamaryns for admin

Nomination: I hereby nominate User:Hamaryns as a local English Wiktionary Administrator. Hamaryns, also known as H. and earlier henne, has been an active contributor since October of last year, working not only on translations into his native Dutch and other languages, but also on templates that make that work more uniform. He recently put together a successful vote on example sentences, which is an issue that I personally have tried but never been able to get any resolution on. DAVilla 00:14, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vote ends: 30 August 2007 23:59 UTC
Vote starts: 16 15 August 2007

Acceptance: of course.
- Languages: nl, de-4, en-3, fr-3, ru-2, is-1 and quite some others which I won’t bother to mention.
- Timezone: CET (=UTC+1), CEST (=UTC+2) in summer.
H. (talk) 08:45, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Support provided he accepts the nomination. —Ruakh_TALK 00:58, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm... strictly speaking, your vote seems a little premature. DAVilla 11:46, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As does mine. I'm changing the start date. DAVilla 11:48, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There has never been a problem with votes before acceptance; of course passage requires acceptance ... Robert Ullmann 23:04, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The problem was that the vote was supposed to start on the 16th, one day ahead. I'm not so sure it's so important to have a "deadline" start time for nominations. DAVilla 06:43, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support DAVilla 11:46, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Medellia 16:54, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Connel MacKenzie 22:41, 15 August 2007 (UTC) Although he originally supported the Proto forms, he learned somewhere along the way (as I did) that not all policies here are personally agreeable. He seems to respect the community's wishes, despite his own difference of opinion on that particular topic. Clearly, en.wiktionary.org will benefit from his having the sysop flag.[reply]
Support Robert Ullmann 23:04, 15 August 2007 (UTC) good idea[reply]
Support Widsith 10:16, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support EncycloPetey 13:54, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jeffqyzt 14:52, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rod (A. Smith) 18:24, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thryduulf 19:07, 16 August 2007 (UTC) (I thought I'd done this already)[reply]
Support Cynewulf 03:20, 17 August 2007 (UTC) Naturally.[reply]
Support ―Tohru 10:53, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Stephen 13:55, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Versageek 14:29, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Saltmarsh 05:59, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Williamsayers79 17:23, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Dmcdevit·t 07:07, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Neskaya ^talk 20:19, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Visviva 14:42, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Abstain

Abstain H. (talk) 08:45, 15 August 2007 (UTC) Well, the vote is not successful yet ;-)[reply]
Can only admins vote in other admins? DAVilla 11:49, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think so, no; at least, I certainly voted in these votes before I became an admin, and no one commented. Besides, admins are supposed to enforce community policy, so the question is whether the community supports a person, not whether the other admins do. —Ruakh_TALK 16:49, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone but sockpuppets of blocked users can nominate & vote. Bureaucrats have the option of ignoring votes they feel may be invalid, but AFAIK, none have done so yet. There is no minimum edit count required, as other language Wiktionaries are sometimes affected by votes here, the door is kept open to allow contributors elsewhere to have a voice here. --Connel MacKenzie 22:47, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone can vote, not just admins, and they should! And the nominee can certainly vote. In "ordinary" elections, politicians always vote for themselves: they are as entitled—of course—to vote as anyone else! ;-) Robert Ullmann 23:04, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
They are also, of course, entitled to vote for anyone else ;-) Thryduulf 09:34, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Decision

Approved 18-0-1. We need a bureaucrat. DAVilla 10:41, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

低血压是什么原因	风热咳嗽吃什么药	梦到男孩子是什么意思	1974年属什么生肖	吃东西就吐是什么原因
预估是什么意思	恨天高是什么意思	米果念什么	白细胞十一是什么意思	后背疼应该挂什么科
宾格是什么	中秋节什么时候	白内障有什么症状表现	对什么有好处的英文	石墨灰是什么颜色
东盟为什么没有中国	为什么会得口腔溃疡	虚岁28岁属什么生肖	月经下不来吃什么药	为什么会得前列腺炎

清肺火吃什么药hcv7jop9ns1r.cn	头爱出汗是什么原因引起的hcv8jop6ns0r.cn	版图是什么意思hcv8jop4ns6r.cn	王玉读什么hcv9jop2ns0r.cn	小鸟站在高压线上为什么不会触电hcv8jop9ns7r.cn
尿不干净有余尿是什么原因hcv8jop2ns1r.cn	血脂高吃什么药效果好imcecn.com	老年人手抖是什么原因hcv8jop3ns7r.cn	丰衣足食是什么意思hcv7jop4ns7r.cn	甲状腺结节有什么感觉cj623037.com
十九岁属什么hcv7jop6ns6r.cn	你本来就很美是什么广告hcv7jop9ns9r.cn	志心皈命礼是什么意思hcv8jop7ns9r.cn	地三鲜是什么菜hcv8jop5ns0r.cn	军长相当于地方什么官hcv8jop5ns6r.cn
孕妇尿酸高是什么原因hcv8jop3ns4r.cn	番茄和西红柿有什么区别hcv9jop6ns0r.cn	什么腿jiuxinfghf.com	槟榔肝是由什么引起的hcv9jop5ns5r.cn	为什么叫清明上河图hcv8jop0ns1r.cn